Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Working Paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | 10.3386/w27295 |
来源ID | Working Paper 27295 |
Wall Street vs. Main Street QE | |
Eric R. Sims; Jing Cynthia Wu | |
发表日期 | 2020-06-08 |
出版年 | 2020 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | The Federal Reserve has reacted swiftly to the COVID-19 pandemic. It has resuscitated many of its programs from the last crisis by lending to the financial sector, which we refer to as “Wall Street QE.” The Fed is now proposing to also lend directly to, and purchase debt directly from, non-financial firms, which we label “Main Street QE.” Our paper develops a new framework to compare and contrast these different policies. In a situation in which financial intermediary balance sheets are impaired, such as the Great Recession, Main Street and Wall Street QE are perfect substitutes and both stimulate aggregate demand. In contrast, for situations like the one we are now facing due to COVID-19, where the production sector is facing significant cash flow shortages, Wall Street QE becomes almost completely ineffective, whereas Main Street QE can be highly stimulative. |
主题 | Macroeconomics ; Monetary Policy ; COVID-19 |
URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w27295 |
来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/584967 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Eric R. Sims,Jing Cynthia Wu. Wall Street vs. Main Street QE. 2020. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
w27295.pdf(381KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Eric R. Sims]的文章 |
[Jing Cynthia Wu]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Eric R. Sims]的文章 |
[Jing Cynthia Wu]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Eric R. Sims]的文章 |
[Jing Cynthia Wu]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。