G2TT
来源类型Working Paper
规范类型报告
DOI10.3386/w27250
来源IDWorking Paper 27250
Research Registries: Facts, Myths, and Possible Improvements
Eliot Abrams; Jonathan Libgober; John A. List
发表日期2020-06-01
出版年2020
语种英语
摘要The past few decades have ushered in an experimental revolution in economics whereby scholars are now much more likely to generate their own data. While there are virtues associated with this movement, there are concomitant difficulties. Several scientific disciplines, including economics, have launched research registries in an effort to attenuate key inferential issues. This study assesses registries both empirically and theoretically, with a special focus on the AEA registry. We find that over 90% of randomized control trials (RCTs) in economics do not register, only 50% of the RCTs that register do so before the intervention begins, and the majority of these preregistrations are not detailed enough to significantly aid inference. Our empirical analysis further shows that using other scientific registries as aspirational examples is misguided, as their perceived success in tackling the main issues is largely a myth. In light of these facts, we advance a simple economic model to explore potential improvements. A key insight from the model is that removal of the (current) option to register completed RCTs could increase the fraction of trials that register. We also argue that linking IRB applications to registrations could further increase registry effectiveness.
主题Other ; History of Economic Thought ; Econometrics ; Experimental Design
URLhttps://www.nber.org/papers/w27250
来源智库National Bureau of Economic Research (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/584921
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Eliot Abrams,Jonathan Libgober,John A. List. Research Registries: Facts, Myths, and Possible Improvements. 2020.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
w27250.pdf(662KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Eliot Abrams]的文章
[Jonathan Libgober]的文章
[John A. List]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Eliot Abrams]的文章
[Jonathan Libgober]的文章
[John A. List]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Eliot Abrams]的文章
[Jonathan Libgober]的文章
[John A. List]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: w27250.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。