| 来源类型 | Working Paper |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| DOI | 10.3386/w18045 |
| 来源ID | Working Paper 18045 |
| Why do we Redistribute so Much but Tag so Little? The principle of equal sacrifice and optimal taxation | |
| Matthew C. Weinzierl | |
| 发表日期 | 2012-05-03 |
| 出版年 | 2012 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | The workhorse model of optimal taxation strongly recommends tagging, but its use in policy is limited. I argue that this puzzle is a symptom of a more fundamental problem. Conventional theory neglects the diverse normative criteria with which, as extensive evidence has shown, most people evaluate policy. In particular, if the classic principle of Equal Sacri...ce augments the standard Utilitarian criterion, optimal tagging is limited. Calibrated simulations of optimal policy with normative diversity of this type simultaneously match three features of U.S. policy: substantial income redistribution; rejection of gender, race, and height tags; and acceptance of a blindness tag. Additional implications increase the appeal of this revision to conventional theory. |
| 主题 | Microeconomics ; Welfare and Collective Choice ; Public Economics ; Taxation |
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w18045 |
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/575721 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Matthew C. Weinzierl. Why do we Redistribute so Much but Tag so Little? The principle of equal sacrifice and optimal taxation. 2012. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| w18045.pdf（384KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Matthew C. Weinzierl]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Matthew C. Weinzierl]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Matthew C. Weinzierl]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
