| 来源类型 | Working Paper
|
| 规范类型 | 报告
|
| DOI | 10.3386/w16980
|
| 来源ID | Working Paper 16980
|
| Funding Scientific Knowledge: Selection, Disclosure and the Public-Private Portfolio |
| Joshua Gans; Fiona E. Murray
|
| 发表日期 | 2011-04-28
|
| 出版年 | 2011
|
| 语种 | 英语
|
| 摘要 | This paper examines argues that while two distinct perspectives characterize the foundations of the public funding of research - filling a selection gap and solving a disclosure problem - in fact both the selection choices of public funders and their criteria for disclosure and commercialization shape the level and type of funding for research and the disclosures that arise as a consequence. In making our argument, we begin by reviewing project selection criteria and policies towards disclosure and commercialization (including patent rights) made by major funding organizations, noting the great variation between these institutions. We then provide a model of how selection criteria and funding conditions imposed by funders interact with the preferences of scientists to shape those projects that accept public funds and the overall level of openness in research. Our analysis reveals complex and unexpected relationships between public funding, private funding, and public disclosure of research. We show, for example, that funding choices made by public agencies can lead to unintended, paradoxical effects, providing short-term openness while stifling longer-term innovation. Implications for empirical evaluation and an agenda for future research are discussed. |
| 主题 | Development and Growth
; Innovation and R&
; D
|
| URL | https://www.nber.org/papers/w16980
|
| 来源智库 | National Bureau of Economic Research (United States)
|
| 引用统计 |
|
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/574655
|
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714 |
Joshua Gans,Fiona E. Murray. Funding Scientific Knowledge: Selection, Disclosure and the Public-Private Portfolio. 2011.
|
|
文件名：
|
w16980.pdf
|
|
格式：
|
Adobe PDF
|
此文件暂不支持浏览
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
