全球智库信息集成服务系统(G2TT): Are Two Heads Better Than One?: An Experimental Analysis of Group vs. Individual Decisionmaking

G2TT

来源类型	Working Paper
规范类型	报告
DOI	10.3386/w7909
来源ID	Working Paper 7909
	Are Two Heads Better Than One?: An Experimental Analysis of Group vs. Individual Decisionmaking
	Alan S. Blinder; John Morgan
发表日期	2000-09-01
出版年	2000
语种	英语
摘要	Two laboratory experiments - one a statistical urn problem, the other a monetary policy experiment - were run to test the commonly-believed hypothesis that groups make decisions more slowly than individuals do. Surprisingly, this turns out not to be true there is no significant difference in average decision lags. Furthermore, and also surprisingly, there is no significant difference in the decision lag when groups decisions are made by majority rule versus when they are made under a unanimity requirement. In addition, group decisions are on average superior to individual decisions. The results are strikingly similar across the two experiments.
主题	Macroeconomics ; Monetary Policy
URL	https://www.nber.org/papers/w7909
来源智库	National Bureau of Economic Research (United States)
引用统计
资源类型	智库出版物
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/565494
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Alan S. Blinder,John Morgan. Are Two Heads Better Than One?: An Experimental Analysis of Group vs. Individual Decisionmaking. 2000.