G2TT
来源类型Discussion paper
规范类型论文
来源IDDP16131
DP16131 How Do Households Respond to Job Loss? Lessons from Multiple High-Frequency Data Sets
Asger Lau Andersen; Amalie Jensen; Niels Johannesen; Claus Thustrup Kreiner; Adam Sheridan
发表日期2021-05-09
出版年2021
语种英语
摘要How do households respond to job loss, and which self-insurance channels are most important? By linking high-frequency customer data from the largest bank in Denmark with government administrative registers, we quantify a broad range of responses to job loss in a unified empirical framework. Two responses stand out: during the first 24 months after job loss, reductions in household spending account for 30% of the income loss, while lower saving in liquid assets accounts for 50%. Other response margins highlighted in the literature - spousal labor supply, private transfers, home equity extraction, mortgage refinancing, and consumer credit - are less important.
主题Labour Economics ; Public Economics
关键词Cost of unemployment Social insurance
URLhttps://cepr.org/publications/dp16131
来源智库Centre for Economic Policy Research (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/545105
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Asger Lau Andersen,Amalie Jensen,Niels Johannesen,et al. DP16131 How Do Households Respond to Job Loss? Lessons from Multiple High-Frequency Data Sets. 2021.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Asger Lau Andersen]的文章
[Amalie Jensen]的文章
[Niels Johannesen]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Asger Lau Andersen]的文章
[Amalie Jensen]的文章
[Niels Johannesen]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Asger Lau Andersen]的文章
[Amalie Jensen]的文章
[Niels Johannesen]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。