G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RRA215-1
来源IDRR-A215-1
Wellcome Sanger Institute and Wellcome Genome Campus Landscape Review
Sarah Parkinson; Joe Francombe; Cagla Stevenson; Hamish Evans; Advait Deshpande; Susan Guthrie
发表日期2021-01-19
出版年2021
页码142
语种英语
结论
  • The Sanger Institute and other large research institutes such as the Broad Institute and NHGRI often play key roles in convening and leading large international research consortia on collaborative projects. This collaborative approach can serve not just as a vehicle for the advancement of genetics and genomics, but also as a vehicle for the broadening of participation and capacity development across the research landscape.
  • The Sanger Institute and other organisations at the Wellcome Genome Campus are committed to data sharing, open access and open research, which has helped them achieve impact from their work. However, there is some suggestion that this openness, combined with a clear focus on fundamental research has contributed to a lower level of commercialisation activity for the Sanger Institute compared with some other organisations such as the Broad Institute.
  • A key strength of the Sanger Institute and other large research institutes such as the Broad Institute is the capacity to undertake genetic and genomic science at scale. High speed and high throughput genomic sequencing technology has helped organisations distinguish themselves, but this kind of technology no longer provides the same competitive advantage since it is becoming more affordable and accessible. This presents both challenges and opportunities for organisations as they look for new ways to differentiate themselves within the research landscape.
摘要

RAND Europe was commissioned by Wellcome to analyse the role and contribution of the Wellcome Sanger Institute and the Wellcome Genome Campus within the field of genetics and genomics. The study also looked at four comparator organisations—the Broad Institute, Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, Janelia Research Campus and the National Human Genome Research Institute. The methods for this study consisted of desk research, case studies, interviews and bibliometric analysis.

,

Our review found that the main strengths of the Sanger Institute and Genome Campus centre around their leadership and convening role in many international research collaborations, which is also a strength for other large research institutes such as the Broad Institute. The Sanger Institute prioritises openness in sharing data and tools and publishing research, which helps them achieve impact from their work. However, this approach has meant that commercialisation of research has not been as strong as compared to other organisations. The field of genetics and genomics is advancing rapidly, particularly due to availability and affordability of high throughput sequencing technologies, which has changed the competitive advantage that such technologies offer to organisations. The next challenge will be to find a direction for these organisations to explore that fits with their scale, operating environments, unique strengths and values. In the case of Sanger, this means finding an approach that capitalises on their ethos of openness, data sharing and collaboration to shape the development of the field over the coming years.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Review of Wellcome Sanger Institute and Wellcome Genome Campus

  • Chapter Three

    Comparator institutions

  • Chapter Four

    Case studies

  • Chapter Five

    Reflections

  • Annex A

    Methodology

  • Annex B

    Interview protocols

  • Annex C

    Case study structure

主题Genetics ; Program Evaluation
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA215-1.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/524334
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Sarah Parkinson,Joe Francombe,Cagla Stevenson,et al. Wellcome Sanger Institute and Wellcome Genome Campus Landscape Review. 2021.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RRA215-1.pdf(2745KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1611088609364.jpg.p(2KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Sarah Parkinson]的文章
[Joe Francombe]的文章
[Cagla Stevenson]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Sarah Parkinson]的文章
[Joe Francombe]的文章
[Cagla Stevenson]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Sarah Parkinson]的文章
[Joe Francombe]的文章
[Cagla Stevenson]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RRA215-1.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1611088609364.jpg.pagespeed.ic.qCkK4ad8P0.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。