全球智库信息集成服务系统

Advantages of videoconferencing in a legal setting include increased safety for court personnel, reductions in costs, and enhanced court efficiency

• Telepresence eliminates the need to transport defendants and offenders, reducing expenditures and potential threats to safety.
• Eliminating the need to transport and secure defendants could expedite pretrial proceedings, increasing efficiency and reducing time spent in jail prior to court dates.
• Telepresence technology could increase access to the legal system for expert witnesses, victims, and other stakeholders who live in remote locations or who fear for their safety in court.
• Telepresence technologies can facilitate the provision of language interpretation services, allowing non-English speakers and individuals with disabilities to access the criminal justice system more easily.
• Telepresence technology enables victims to testify without experiencing the trauma of being physically present with their offender.

Concerns remain regarding the potential impact of telepresence technology on constitutional rights, the behavior of court actors, and perceptions of credibility

• Videoconferencing might influence the judgment and behavior of individuals who appear in court remotely. Defendants and witnesses who are not present might not fully appreciate the gravity of the proceeding, increasing the risk that they engage in impulsive behavior or that they become disengaged from the legal process.
• Videoconferencing could affect assessments of demeanor and nonverbal cues in ways that reduce the speaker's perceived credibility.
• Telepresence might have an appreciable negative impact on the outcomes of cases in which it is used: It might inadvertently encourage harsher responses on the part of the court.
• Telepresence technologies are far from infallible. A poor connection raises concerns for the constitutional rights of court parties, while technical issues could delay or disrupt court proceedings.
• Telepresence might affect the attorney-client relationship by threatening their ability to carry out private communications.

Local jurisdictions, faced with caseloads of increasing complexity and cost, have adopted alternative approaches to criminal case processing — including the use of new technologies — that have the potential to reduce backlog and improve judicial efficiency. Telepresence technology, which allows an individual or group of individuals to appear in a court proceeding from a remote location, is one example of such a technology. On behalf of the National Institute of Justice, RTI International and the RAND Corporation convened the Court Appearances Through Telepresence Advisory Workshop in November 2018 as part of the Priority Criminal Justice Needs Initiative. The telepresence workshop was designed to explore the potential benefits and burdens of telepresence technology and identify innovative solutions for addressing concerns regarding the use of these technologies for criminal court appearances. Participants acknowledged the potential benefits of telepresence technology in expediting pretrial and trial case processing; providing cost savings; and expanding the ability of victims, witnesses, language interpreters, and other individuals to participate. However, the panel members also discussed the potential disadvantages of telepresence technology, which can result in a violation of the defendant's constitutional rights or increase the risk of an unfavorable outcome. Participants also expressed the need for detailed technical standards and stakeholder-specific trainings that ensure the proper setup and high-quality multipurpose use of telepresence technology in court. Given the complexity of the issues involved, the participants emphasized the need to enable state and local courts to handle data collection and storage in a manner that preserves the trial record.