G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR1934
来源IDRR-1934-NIJ
Can an Informative Letter Reduce Gun Crime and Be Cost-Effective? A Study of Los Angeles
Priscillia Hunt; Layla Parast; Gabriel Weinberger
发表日期2017-08-02
出版年2017
页码48
语种英语
结论

Effects on Prevention

  • We were unable to detect a reliable citywide effect for the letter program on homicides, robberies, or aggravated assaults with a firearm.
  • While a statistical analysis would not have been able to identify the prevention of one or two crimes at a citywide level regardless of the true effects, it is also unclear whether the letter program can prevent any firearm violence.
  • One limitation of our methodology is that people could have transferred guns to individuals who committed gun crimes outside of Los Angeles, thus contaminating our control group.

Costs

  • The cost of the program was approximately $1.13 to $1.85 per letter, or $145 to $428 per day.
  • Considering the cost of the program relative to the societal benefits of preventing victimization, if the program prevents one homicide, one aggravated assault, or two robberies, then the program achieves a net benefit to society.

Statistical Approaches

  • For the short-term, time-series model, results suggest an immediate decline in firearms robberies after implementation of the letter program, but no such changes in aggravated assaults or homicides with a firearm.
  • Using the long-term, time-series model, results suggest no statistically significant effect on firearms robberies, but a statistically significant decrease of homicide with a handgun and aggravated assault with a firearm.
  • Because results are so highly sensitive to model specification, they are not robust enough to draw conclusions.
  • Similarly, a comparative case study approach was also used but did not identify a good enough statistical control group for Los Angeles to reliably analyze the effect of the letter.
摘要

In 2007, the Los Angeles City Attorney's Office implemented a pilot study of a gun letter intervention to deter straw purchases and other illegal transfers of firearms, and to increase reporting of lost or stolen firearms. The intervention involved sending a letter to handgun purchasers during their ten-day waiting periods between purchase and taking possession of the firearm, which advised the purchaser that the new weapon was registered to them and that failure to properly record any transfer or loss of the weapon with California's Department of Justice could result in the owners' liability for any future misuse of the gun. A pilot randomized controlled trial of the letter program was conducted in two neighborhoods of the city of Los Angeles from May 2007 to September 2008.

,

Five years after the pilot study, the letter program was fully implemented citywide from January 1, 2013, through September 1, 2015. Letters were sent to all handgun purchasers residing in city of Los Angeles zip codes during the ten-day waiting period. Our study expanded on the pilot study, using two statistical approaches to assess the effect on firearm violence.

,

This report evaluates the effect of the letters sent by the Los Angeles City Attorney's Office on city-level rates of homicide, robbery, and aggravated assault with a firearm and conducts a cost-benefit assessment of this letter program.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Data on the Los Angeles Citywide Gun Letter Program

  • Chapter Three

    Gun Crime in the City of Los Angeles

  • Chapter Four

    How We Studied Effects on Gun Crime and Program Costs

  • Chapter Five

    Costs of the Gun Letter Intervention

  • Chapter Six

    Lessons on the Impacts of the Letter Program

  • Chapter Seven

    Can the Program Benefits Outweigh the Costs?

主题Crime and Violence Prevention ; Gun Violence ; Los Angeles
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1934.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523349
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Priscillia Hunt,Layla Parast,Gabriel Weinberger. Can an Informative Letter Reduce Gun Crime and Be Cost-Effective? A Study of Los Angeles. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR1934.pdf(838KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1612274345209.jpg(4KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Priscillia Hunt]的文章
[Layla Parast]的文章
[Gabriel Weinberger]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Priscillia Hunt]的文章
[Layla Parast]的文章
[Gabriel Weinberger]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Priscillia Hunt]的文章
[Layla Parast]的文章
[Gabriel Weinberger]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR1934.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1612274345209.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。