G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR1301
来源IDRR-1301-OSD
Improving DoD Support to FEMA's All-Hazards Plans
Michael J. McNerney; Christopher M. Schnaubelt; Agnes Gereben Schaefer; Martina Melliand; Bill Gelfeld
发表日期2015-11-30
出版年2015
语种英语
结论

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) All-Hazards Plans (AHPs)

  • Each of FEMA's ten regions is responsible for writing AHPs that guide response efforts in the wake of disasters, including large-scale catastrophes. Several regions have also written incident specific plans, which offer specific, tailored guidance for the most likely, high-level threats each region faces.
  • Some of these plans are comprehensive and complete, while others are missing some sections or information, and some are incomplete or missing a lot of information.
  • Clear expectations for potential types and numbers of resources are critical for DoD to be able to fully support FEMA in the wake of a disaster, particularly a large-scale catastrophe.

Defense Support of Civil Authorities (DSCA) Support Provided by DoD to FEMA

  • DoD support to FEMA regional planning is working well in some areas, including DoD integration with FEMA planning, logistics support planning, and DoD participation in FEMA exercises.
  • Challenges include conflicting perceptions within DoD of the relative priority of DSCA, sourcing of DoD forces for DSCA missions, conflicting objectives of DSCA exercises between DoD and FEMA, the dual-status commander construct, and lack of visibility into installation- and unit-level immediate response plans.
摘要

Disaster preparedness and response is a national priority, in which the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) plays a supporting — but potentially crucial — role. In the ten years since Hurricane Katrina, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has taken steps to strengthen its ability to plan and coordinate the U.S. government's response to disasters, while the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has worked to improve its support to FEMA. This research reviews and analyzes how DoD and FEMA work together to plan and execute disaster response activities, and recommends areas for improvement. The study team (1) analyzed FEMA plans and DoD policies for Defense Support of Civil Authorities (DSCA); (2) analyzed how DoD provides DSCA support to FEMA, including key stakeholder perceptions, in order to identify potential capability gaps that DoD could fill; and (3) developed recommendations for how DoD can improve its support — in terms of planning, coordination, and providing requested capabilities — to FEMA.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Review of FEMA All-Hazards Plans and Identification of Potential Capability Gaps

  • Chapter Three

    Review of Policies, Plans, and Procedures for Defense Support of Civil Authorities

  • Chapter Four

    Recommendations for Improving DoD Support to FEMA

  • Appendix A

    Overview of the National Response System

  • Appendix B

    Overview of Policy and Other Guidance

主题Civil-Military Relations ; Disaster Recovery Operations ; Emergency Preparedness ; United States Department of Defense
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1301.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/522907
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Michael J. McNerney,Christopher M. Schnaubelt,Agnes Gereben Schaefer,et al. Improving DoD Support to FEMA's All-Hazards Plans. 2015.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR1301.pdf(940KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1495316313348.jpg(9KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Michael J. McNerney]的文章
[Christopher M. Schnaubelt]的文章
[Agnes Gereben Schaefer]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Michael J. McNerney]的文章
[Christopher M. Schnaubelt]的文章
[Agnes Gereben Schaefer]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Michael J. McNerney]的文章
[Christopher M. Schnaubelt]的文章
[Agnes Gereben Schaefer]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR1301.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1495316313348.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。