Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Publication |
来源ID | Learning Systems for Accountable Care Organizations |
Centers for Dialysis Care's Patient Advisory Committees (Case Study) | |
Meg Maxwell; Neni Osuoha; and Kate D'; Anello | |
发表日期 | 2019-10-30 |
出版者 | Baltimore, MD: U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services |
出版年 | 2019 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | This case study describes how the Centers for Dialysis Care (CDC) created patient advisory committees to proactively address its patients’ concerns and improve the delivery of care.", |
摘要 | Key Findings: Anecdotal feedback from staff and patients reflect that PACS have meaningfully and positively influenced the experience of care. Recommendations from the PACs have also resulted in significant updates to CDC’s dialysis unit safety training and dialysis equipment as well as improvements to the intake processes. This case study describes how the Centers for Dialysis Care (CDC) created patient advisory committees to proactively address its patients’ concerns and improve the delivery of care. The committees provide a forum for patient and staff representatives to collaboratively address opportunities for improving care within the dialysis units. CDC has made multiple changes to these units as a result of insight gleaned from the committees, such as new dialysis chairs to improve the patients’ experience of care and enhanced security for the building entrance. Patients have shared their appreciation for not only the opportunity to raise their concerns with staff during committee discussions but also CDC’s responsiveness to these concerns. |
URL | https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/centers-for-dialysis-cares-patient-advisory-committees-case-study |
来源智库 | Mathematica Policy Research (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/489752 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Meg Maxwell,Neni Osuoha,and Kate D',et al. Centers for Dialysis Care's Patient Advisory Committees (Case Study). 2019. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
CEC Case Study CDC P(161KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。