Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Publication |
Variation in Physicians’ Electronic Health Record Documentation and Potential Patient Harm from That Variation | |
Genna R. Cohen; Charles P. Friedman; Andrew M. Ryan; Caroline R. Richardson; Julia Adler-Milstein | |
发表日期 | 2019-06-10 |
出版者 | Journal of General Internal Medicine (online ahead of print) |
出版年 | 2019 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | Physician-to-physician variation in EHR documentation impedes effective and safe use of EHRs, but there are potential strategies to mitigate negative consequences.", |
摘要 | Background. Physician-to-physician variation in electronic health record (EHR) documentation not driven by patients’ clinical status could be harmful. Objective. Measure variation in completion of common clinical documentation domains. Identify perceived causes and effects of variation and strategies to mitigate negative effects. Design. Sequential, explanatory, mixed methods using log data from a commercial EHR vendor and semi-structured interviews with outpatient primary care practices. Participants. Quantitative: 170,332 encounters led by 809 physicians in 237 practices. Qualitative: 40 interviewees in 10 practices. Main Measures. Interquartile range (IQR) of the proportion of encounters in which a physician completed documentation, for each documentation category. Multilevel linear regression measured the proportion of variation at the physician level. Key Results.Five clinical documentation categories had substantial and statistically significant (p lt; 0.001) variation at the physician level after accounting for state, organization, and practice levels: (1) discussing results (IQR = 50.8%, proportion of variation explained by physician level = 78.1%); (2) assessment and diagnosis (IQR = 60.4%, physician-level variation = 76.0%); (3) problem list (IQR = 73.1%, physician-level variation = 70.1%); (4) review of systems (IQR = 62.3%, physician-level variation = 67.7%); and (5) social history (IQR = 53.3%, physician-level variation = 62.2%). Drivers of variation from interviews included user preferences and EHR designs with multiple places to record similar information. Variation was perceived to create documentation inefficiencies and risk patient harm due to missed or misinterpreted information. Mitigation strategies included targeted user training during EHR implementation and practice meetings focused on documentation standardization. Conclusions. Physician-to-physician variation in EHR documentation impedes effective and safe use of EHRs, but there are potential strategies to mitigate negative consequences. |
URL | https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/variation-in-physicians-electronic-health-record-documentation-and-potential-patient-harm |
来源智库 | Mathematica Policy Research (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/489611 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Genna R. Cohen,Charles P. Friedman,Andrew M. Ryan,等. Variation in Physicians’ Electronic Health Record Documentation and Potential Patient Harm from That Variation. 2019. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。