Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Publication |
来源ID | Commentary |
The Physician Workforce and Counting What Counts in Primary Care | |
Eugene C. Rich | |
发表日期 | 2018-09-01 |
出版者 | Family Medicine, vol. 50, no. 8 |
出版年 | 2018 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | The US debate over the primary care workforce began in the 1960s with the collapse of medical student interest in general practice and the growth in specialty training. ", |
摘要 | The U.S. debate over the primary care workforce began in the 1960s with the collapse of medical student interest in general practice and the growth in specialty training. This led to the Millis Commission report on graduate medical education that identified the need for the “primary physician” to “serve as the primary medical resource and counselor to an individual or a family.” Nonetheless, even current workforce analyses reflect ongoing confusion regarding what primary care is, and which clinicians can provide it. This problem may contribute to conflicting assessments in several recent reports of the current and future workforce needs in primary care. |
URL | https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/the-physician-workforce-and-counting-what-counts-in-primary-care |
来源智库 | Mathematica Policy Research (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/489341 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Eugene C. Rich. The Physician Workforce and Counting What Counts in Primary Care. 2018. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Eugene C. Rich]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Eugene C. Rich]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Eugene C. Rich]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。