| 来源类型 | Publication |
| 来源ID | White Paper |
| Selecting the Best Comparison Group and Evaluation Design: A Guidance Document for State Section 1115 Demonstration Evaluations | |
| James D. Reschovsky; Jessica Heeringa; and Maggie Colby | |
| 发表日期 | 2018-06-30 |
| 出版者 | Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research |
| 出版年 | 2018 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 概述 | This guidance document focuses on quantitative impact evaluations, which assess the causal effects of an intervention by comparing outcomes under the demonstration’s policies with an estimate of what would have happened under a counterfactual—that is, what would have happened in the absence of those policies or if the policies had been implemented differently.", |
| 摘要 | This guidance document focuses on quantitative impact evaluations, which assess the causal effects of an intervention by comparing outcomes under the demonstration’s policies with an estimate of what would have happened under a counterfactual—that is, what would have happened in the absence of those policies or if the policies had been implemented differently. |
| URL | https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/selecting-the-best-comparison-group-and-evaluation-design-a-guidance-document-for-state-section-1115 |
| 来源智库 | Mathematica Policy Research (United States) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/489290 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | James D. Reschovsky,Jessica Heeringa,and Maggie Colby. Selecting the Best Comparison Group and Evaluation Design: A Guidance Document for State Section 1115 Demonstration Evaluations. 2018. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| comparison grp eval （851KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
