| 来源类型 | Publication
|
| 来源ID | NCEE Evaluation Brief
|
| Promoting Educator Effectiveness: The Effects of Two Key Strategies |
| Andrew Wayne; Michael Garet; Alison Wellington; and Hanley Chiang
|
| 发表日期 | 2018-03-21
|
| 出版者 | Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance
|
| 出版年 | 2018
|
| 语种 | 英语
|
| 概述 | This brief brings together the findings of two studies from the Institute of Education Sciences that examined specific strategies supported by the Teacher Incentive Fund.", |
| 摘要 |
Key Findings:
- Providing educators with performance feedback and offering pay-for-performance bonuses can improve student achievement. Across years of implementation, each tested strategy sometimes had a positive cumulative impact on students’ math or reading achievement.
- Features of the measures or programs and on-the-ground implementation may limit the effectiveness of the program strategies. Both studies provided evidence that the policy as implemented differed in some ways from the approach envisioned. For example, in the pay-for-performance study, about 40 percent of the teachers were unaware they were eligible to receive a performance bonus.
- Educators can be receptive to some of the evaluation and compensation strategies supported by TIF and TSL. Sixty-five to 84 percent of the educators reported being satisfied with the feedback they received on their practices. In addition, pay-for-performance ultimately led to improvements in teachers’ satisfaction with some aspects of their jobs.
This brief brings together the findings of two studies from the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) that examined specific strategies supported by TIF. One study, conducted over two years, examined the effects of using research-based performance measures to evaluate educators and provide them with feedback—a strategy referred to here as performance feedback. The second study, conducted over four years, evaluated the effects of offering bonuses to educators based on their performance ratings—a strategy referred to as pay-for-performance. Although no single large-scale study has evaluated the effects of a full, comprehensive program, like those supported by TIF and TSL, these studies can provide insight on the potential effects of two strategies that are prominent in such programs. In addition, evidence from both studies suggests areas of potential improvement for programs that support or expand human capital initiatives in schools and highlights potential avenues for future research. |
| URL | https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/promoting-educator-effectiveness-the-effects-of-two-key-strategies
|
| 来源智库 | Mathematica Policy Research (United States)
|
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/489181
|
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714 |
Andrew Wayne,Michael Garet,Alison Wellington,et al. Promoting Educator Effectiveness: The Effects of Two Key Strategies. 2018.
|
|
文件名：
|
TIF Brief 508.pdf
|
|
格式：
|
Adobe PDF
|
此文件暂不支持浏览
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
