Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Publication |
来源ID | OPRE Report 2017-115 |
Market Rate Surveys and Alternative Methods of Data Collection and Analysis to Inform Subsidy Payment Rates | |
Eiizabeth Davis; Lynn A. Karoly; Bobbie Weber; Pia Caronongan; Kathryn Tout; Patti Banghart; Sara Shaw; and Anne Partika | |
发表日期 | 2017-12-30 |
出版者 | Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation |
出版年 | 2017 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | This brief provides information on key issues and criteria for choosing whether to conduct a market rate survey, use an alternative methodology such as a cost model, or both.", |
摘要 | Key Findings:
Over 1.4 million children in the United States receive child care subsidies each month, provided through the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) and administered at the state or local level (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2015). Subsidies assist families in paying for child care arrangements so that low-income parents, including parents transitioning from welfare, can work or attend training and education programs. One of the key determinants of access to child care for families receiving CCDF subsidies is provider payment rates set by States and Territories. When payment rates are low relative to market prices, providers may choose not to serve children using subsidies or may charge parents the difference between the subsidy payment rate and the price the provider charges parents who do not receive a subsidy (where allowed). States and Territories now face new considerations when collecting data to inform the process of setting provider payment rates. This brief provides information on key issues and criteria for choosing whether to conduct a market rate survey, use an alternative methodology such as a cost model, or both. The intent of the brief is to provide a concise synthesis of existing research and expert guidance on methods States and Territories can use to collect information on child care prices and costs to inform child care subsidy payment rates. The brief offers criteria to evaluate different methods to assess price and cost. The brief also discusses the concept of equal access that States and Territories address in their CCDF plans. |
URL | https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/market-rate-surveys-and-alternative-methods-of-data-collection-and-analysis-to-inform-subsidy |
来源智库 | Mathematica Policy Research (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/489103 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Eiizabeth Davis,Lynn A. Karoly,Bobbie Weber,et al. Market Rate Surveys and Alternative Methods of Data Collection and Analysis to Inform Subsidy Payment Rates. 2017. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
cceepra_methods_for_(1474KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。