Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Publication |
来源ID | D.C. Metro Area Community Report |
Washington, D.C., Area Health Care Market Sticks to Fee for Service; Dips Toe into Value-Based Payment | |
Ha T. Tu; Laurie Felland; Paul B. Ginsburg; Kristie Liao; Kevin Draper; and Rebecca Gourevitch | |
发表日期 | 2014-12-02 |
出版者 | Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research and Highland, MD: Jayne Koskinas Ted Giovanis Foundation for Health and Policy |
出版年 | 2014 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | Despite acknowledging the inevitable shift from fee-for-service to value-based payment and the need to develop population-management capabilities, most D.C. metro area hospitals are sticking to fee-for-service competitive strategies to attract patients by building urgent care centers and freestanding emergency departments in affluent, well-insured areas, according to a new qualitative study by Mathematica Policy Research for the Jayne Koskinas Ted Giovanis Foundation for Health and Policy.", |
摘要 | Key Findings:
With a strong, stable economy anchored by the federal government, a large high-wage professional-services sector, and unemployment well below the national average, the National Capital Region has one of the most affluent, educated, and well-insured populations in the United States. The region includes the District of Columbia; Montgomery and Prince George’s counties in Maryland; and Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun, and Prince William counties in Northern Virginia. Despite the region’s overall affluence, significant pockets of poverty exist, most notably in Washington, D.C., and Prince George’s County. The federal government sets a relatively high benchmark for health benefits, but many employers—including law firms, lobbying firms, high-end government contractors, and others competing for high-wage workers—outdo the government in benefit richness. Most employers take a conservative approach to health benefits; they are less likely to self-insure and less aggressive in seeking cost-containment innovations than comparably-sized employers in other markets. Health care leaders acknowledge the inevitable shift from fee-for-service to value-based payment and the need for their organizations to develop population-management capabilities. Yet, most hospitals continue to emphasize fee-for-service strategies in an updated hub-and-spoke model—with newer ambulatory venues such as freestanding emergency department and urgent care centers strategically located to attract more patients—especially affluent, well-insured patients—to a particular system. In some cases, however, hospitals are using these new ambulatory networks to position themselves for population health management under value-based payment. This persistence of fee-for-service strategies likely stems from the commercial insurance market’s “pass-through” environment that enables provider rate increases to be passed on to employers through premium increases because the market has many employers able to absorb the additional costs and no large, influential employers pushing for cost-containment innovations. |
URL | https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/washington-dc-area-health-care-market-sticks-to-fee-for-service-dips-toe-into-valuebased-payment |
来源智库 | Mathematica Policy Research (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/487894 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Ha T. Tu,Laurie Felland,Paul B. Ginsburg,et al. Washington, D.C., Area Health Care Market Sticks to Fee for Service; Dips Toe into Value-Based Payment. 2014. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
DC_Area_Community_Rp(478KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。