| 来源类型 | Publication |
| 来源ID | Home Visiting Programs OPRE Report #2014-49 |
| What Isn't There Matters: Attrition and Randomized Controlled Trials | |
| Sarah A. Avellar; Timothy Silman | |
| 发表日期 | 2014-08-29 |
| 出版者 | Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation |
| 出版年 | 2014 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 概述 | What is sample attrition, why does it matter, and how does it factor into study ratings in the Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness (HomVEE) review? This new brief from the HomVEE team gives an overview of the issues related to attrition and how it can affect evaluation findings.", |
| 摘要 | A randomized controlled trial (RCT) offers a highly credible way to evaluate the effect of a program. However, a strong design can be offset by weaknesses in planning or execution. One common problem that weakens the conclusions of RCTs is attrition, or missing data. This brief describes what attrition is, why it matters, and how it factors into the study ratings in the HomVEE review. |
| URL | https://www.mathematica.org/our-publications-and-findings/publications/what-isnt-there-matters-attrition-and-randomized-controlled-trials |
| 来源智库 | Mathematica Policy Research (United States) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/487824 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Sarah A. Avellar,Timothy Silman. What Isn't There Matters: Attrition and Randomized Controlled Trials. 2014. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| HomeVee_Attrition_RC（292KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
