G2TT
来源类型Article
规范类型其他
DOI10.1016/j.erss.2019.101245
ISBN2214-6296
Comparing nuclear trajectories in Germany and the United Kingdom: from regimes to democracies in sociotechnical transitions and discontinuities.
Johnstone, Philip; Stirling, Andy
发表日期2020-01-02
出处Energy Research and Social Science
出版者Elsevier
出版年2020
页码1-27
语种英语
摘要This paper focuses on the starkly differing nuclear policies of Germany and the UK. Germany has committed to discontinue nuclear power, aiming to phase the technology out by 2022. The UK has long professed the aim of a ‘nuclear renaissance’, promoting the most ambitious nuclear construction programme in Europe. The present analysis of this contrast is based around a simple yet fundamental question: which aspects contribute most to producing such divergent energy developments in these two countries? Distinguishing possible interpretive dimensions that are relatively ‘internal’ or ‘external’ to the main foci of attention in sociotechnical transitions theory, we develop a novel set of criteria spanning technical, economic, resource-based and political issues. Under each, we ask whether specific characteristics of either national setting would tend to make the phase out of nuclear power more or less likely. Our findings are that ‘internal’ aspects tend to predict discontinuity to be more likely in the UK than Germany. Only ‘external’ aspects clearly predict the actual trend. We argue on this basis that sociotechnical discontinuity is rather poorly explained by reference to the circumscribed concepts highlighted in conventional narrow versions of transitions theory. What is evidently more important, are wider political factors relating broadly to general 'qualities of democracy'.
关键词nuclear energy transitions transformation UK Germany democracy discontinuity
URLhttp://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/85576/
来源智库Science Policy Research Unit (United Kingdom)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/469285
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Johnstone, Philip,Stirling, Andy. Comparing nuclear trajectories in Germany and the United Kingdom: from regimes to democracies in sociotechnical transitions and discontinuities.. 2020.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Johnstone, Philip]的文章
[Stirling, Andy]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Johnstone, Philip]的文章
[Stirling, Andy]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Johnstone, Philip]的文章
[Stirling, Andy]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。