Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Article |
规范类型 | 其他 |
DOI | 10.1038/d41586-018-06128-3 |
ISBN | 0028-0836 |
Evaluate power and bias in synthesizing evidence for policy. | |
Stirling, Andy; Mitchell, Clive | |
发表日期 | 2018-09-06 |
出处 | Nature |
出版者 | Nature Publishing Group |
出版年 | 2018 |
页码 | 33-33 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | In our view, the four principles for making evidence synthesis more useful for policy would be strengthened by taking power and bias into account (C. A. Donnelly et al. Nature 558, 361–364; 2018). Otherwise, the principles could fall short for issues that involve uncertain facts, disputed values, high stakes and urgent decisions — as in global biodiversity loss and climate change, for example. |
URL | http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/78575/ |
来源智库 | Science Policy Research Unit (United Kingdom) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/469113 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Stirling, Andy,Mitchell, Clive. Evaluate power and bias in synthesizing evidence for policy.. 2018. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
stirling and mitchel(611KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。