中文版 | English
G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
The 2016 BLM Methane Waste Prevention Rule: Should It Stay or Should It Go?
Alan J. Krupnick; Isabel Echarte
发表日期2018-04-18
出版年2018
页码29 pp.
语种英语
概述

Our first report in a series examining US oil and gas sector regulations evaluates the costs and benefits of repealing or modifying BLM’s 2016 methane waste prevention rule under several scenarios.

结论
  • Whether repealing the rule results in net benefits depends entirely on which estimate of the social cost of methane (SC-CH4) is used in the analysis (i.e., accounting for either domestic costs only or global costs).
  • Using a domestic SC-CH4, repealing the rule results in net benefits of $495 million to $860 million. With a global SC-CH4, repeal results in net costs of $814 million to $1.2 billion.
  • Adjusting other assumptions in our analysis results in only slight changes to the net benefits of repealing the rule.
    • 主题Energy and Electricity
    子主题Benefit-Cost Analysis ; Natural Gas ; Oil ; Shale Gas
    URLhttp://www.rff.org/research/publications/2016-blm-methane-waste-prevention-rule-should-it-stay-or-should-it-go
    来源智库Resources for the Future (United States)
    资源类型智库出版物
    条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/39500
    推荐引用方式
    GB/T 7714    		 Alan J. Krupnick,Isabel Echarte. The 2016 BLM Methane Waste Prevention Rule: Should It Stay or Should It Go?. 2018.
    条目包含的文件
    条目无相关文件。
    个性服务
    推荐该条目
    保存到收藏夹
    导出为Endnote文件
    谷歌学术
    谷歌学术中相似的文章
    [Alan J. Krupnick]的文章
    [Isabel Echarte]的文章
    百度学术
    百度学术中相似的文章
    [Alan J. Krupnick]的文章
    [Isabel Echarte]的文章
    必应学术
    必应学术中相似的文章
    [Alan J. Krupnick]的文章
    [Isabel Echarte]的文章
    相关权益政策
    暂无数据
    收藏/分享

    除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。