Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | DIIS Working Paper |
规范类型 | 工作论文 |
Analysing Climate Finance Coordination | |
Erik Lundsgaarde, Adam Moe FejerskovJakob Skovgaard | |
发表日期 | 2018-12-07 |
出版年 | 2018 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | Explaining coordination and its limitations |
摘要 | Finance to support climate change mitigation and adaptation comes from diverse sources. Coordination among the multiplicity of actors involved in finance provision and delivery has the potential to limit the duplication of efforts, lower administrative costs, and ensure that resource commitments reinforce one another to achieve greater impacts. Despite these possible advantages of coordination, collaboration among funders has limitations in practice. In this working paper, Erik Lundsgaarde, Adam Moe Fejerskov, and Jakob Skovgaard identify factors that can be used to analyze coordination choices. The paper presents an overview of how coordination is conceptualized and explained in literatures dealing with global environmental governance, aid management, and organizational analysis. Although these literatures differ with respect to the levels of analysis they emphasize, the paper points to common threads in the explanations for coordination they propose. The paper provides a foundation for further empirical work on the determinants of climate finance coordination. |
主题 | Climate change and environment ; Development in practice ; World politics ; Diplomacy and international organisations |
URL | https://www.diis.dk/en/research/collaboration-on-climate-funding |
来源智库 | Danish Institute for International Studies (Denmark) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/392979 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Erik Lundsgaarde, Adam Moe FejerskovJakob Skovgaard. Analysing Climate Finance Coordination. 2018. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
WP_2018_10_Analysing(502KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
global-day-of-action(36KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | ![]() 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。