Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report/paper |
规范类型 | 报告 |
来源ID | X00122 |
Are alternative livelihood projects effective at reducing local threats to specified elements of biodiversity and/or improving or maintaining the conservation status of those elements? A systematic review protocol | |
Dilys Roe; Mike Day; Francesca Booker; Wen Zhou; Sophie Allebone-Webb; Noëlle Kümpel; Nicholas A O Hill; Juliet Wright; Niki Rust; Terry CH Sunderland; Kent Redford; Gillian Petrokofsky | |
发表日期 | 2014 |
出处 | Environmental Evidence |
出版者 | Collaboration for Environmental Evidence |
出版年 | 2014 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Alternative livelihood projects are used by a variety of organisations as a tool for achieving conservation results. Yet these interventions, including their objectives, vary a great deal, and there is no single accepted definition of what constitutes an alternative livelihood project. In addition, very little is known about what impacts, if any, alternative livelihoods projects have had on biodiversity conservation, as well as what determines the success or failure of these interventions. Reflecting this concern, a resolution was passed at the IUCN World Conservation Congress in 2012 calling for a critical review of the benefits to biodiversity of alternative livelihood projects. This systematic review is intended to contribute to this resolution. |
主题 | Biodiversity ; Monitoring ; evaluation and learning |
URL | https://pubs.iied.org/X00122/?c=biodiv&p=21 |
来源智库 | International Institute for Environment and Development (United Kingdom) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/317528 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Dilys Roe,Mike Day,Francesca Booker,et al. Are alternative livelihood projects effective at reducing local threats to specified elements of biodiversity and/or improving or maintaining the conservation status of those elements? A systematic review protocol. 2014. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。