Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Discussion paper |
规范类型 | 其他 |
来源ID | G03715 |
Biodiversity, ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: What constitutes good evidence? | |
Chris Sandbrook | |
发表日期 | 2013 |
出版者 | PCLG |
出版年 | 2013 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | PCLG Discussion Paper number 10 is intended to stimulate debate about what consitutes good evidence in biodiversity, ecosystem services and poverty alleviation research. The paper has been produced as a component of the project “Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services and Poverty Alleviation: Assessing the Current State of the Evidence”, funded by an Evidence and Impact Research Grant, under the DFID-NERC-ESRC Ecosystem Services and Poverty Alleviation (ESPA) research programme. This paper provides a brief overview of the literature on evidence, with a particular emphasis on the question of what constitutes good evidence. In doing so it seeks to identify a series of key take-home messages, rather than to provide a detailed review of what is a highly theorised and technical academic literature. This publication is an output of the Poverty and Conservation Learning Group (PCLG) - Discussion Paper, number 10 |
URL | https://pubs.iied.org/G03715/?c=biodiv&p=24 |
来源智库 | International Institute for Environment and Development (United Kingdom) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/317123 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Chris Sandbrook. Biodiversity, ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: What constitutes good evidence?. 2013. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
G03715.pdf(1060KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Chris Sandbrook]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Chris Sandbrook]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Chris Sandbrook]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。