Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Papers |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.26889/9781784670245 |
Evolution of gas pipeline regulation in Russia – Third party access, capacity allocation and transportation tariffs | |
Katja Yafimava | |
发表日期 | 2015-03-23 |
出版年 | 2015 |
页码 | 8 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | Executive Summary Russia has been reforming its domestic gas transportation regime since the mid-2000s and achieved significant progress through an introduction of legal unbundling, establishment of a legal/regulatory framework for non-discriminatory access and a new zonal tariff methodology. However the existing framework remains insufficiently developed both in scope (e.g. non-applicability to non-UGS systems, storage and […] |
摘要 | Executive Summary Russia has been reforming its domestic gas transportation regime since the mid-2000s and achieved significant progress through an introduction of legal unbundling, establishment of a legal/regulatory framework for non-discriminatory access and a new zonal tariff methodology. However the existing framework remains insufficiently developed both in scope (e.g. non-applicability to non-UGS systems, storage and LNG infrastructure) and content (e.g. significant room for discretion in choice of routes for third party gas and capacity allocation in the event of capacity deficit); the new draft framework, currently under discussion in government, aims to address these problems. From the Russian state’s point of view, the aim of domestic gas market reform – including the reform of the gas transportation regime – is to establish a level playing field for Gazprom and non-Gazprom parties in order to ensure the optimal development of the domestic gas sector and the Russian economy as a whole, while preserving the country’s competitive position as an exporter to both European and Asian gas markets. A new study by Katja Yafimava argues that at present, this aim is to be achieved by increasing direct government involvement and strengthened FTS (Federal Tariff Service) and FAS (Federal Antimonopoly Service) oversight. However, should these measures fail, then more radical measures such as abolition of the UGS system indivisibility principle, with subsequent Gazprom ownership unbundling and the state becoming the owner of both the UGS and non-UGS networks, might be required. In early 2015, however, this seems a ‘last resort’ measure which is not under consideration by the authorities. |
主题 | Gas Programme |
关键词 | capacity allocation Eastern Gas Programme NG 95 non-discriminatory access Regulation Russia tariff methodology Unified Gas Supply system |
URL | https://www.oxfordenergy.org/publications/evolution-of-gas-pipeline-regulation-in-russia-third-party-access-capacity-allocation-and-transportation-tariffs/ |
来源智库 | Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (United Kingdom) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/312359 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Katja Yafimava. Evolution of gas pipeline regulation in Russia – Third party access, capacity allocation and transportation tariffs. 2015. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
NG-95.pdf(2913KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Katja Yafimava]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Katja Yafimava]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Katja Yafimava]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。