G2TT
来源类型Working Paper
规范类型论文
Unlocking Private Climate Investment
Giulia Christianson; Shally Venugopal; Shilpa Patel
发表日期2013-09
出版年2013
语种英语
概述

Executive Summary

As global mean temperatures rise, governments and public financial institutions are seeking ways to mobilize the several hundred billion dollars of finance required to limit the growth of greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries and develop climate-resilient economies. This working paper is one in a series of papers that examines how public funds can mobilize private investment to help meet the significant needs of developing countries. We examine two public actors—the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) and the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank)—which together intermediated 37% (over $2 billion) of total US assistance to developing countries for climate change activities from 2010 to 2012 by exclusively financing private sector projects.

The paper draws from the experiences of OPIC and Ex-Im Bank to inform other public financial institutions and mechanisms—including the Green Climate Fund and public intermediaries of climate finance—about how financial instruments can be employed to promote private sector investment in climate-relevant sectors.

The paper focuses on three aspects of OPIC and Ex-Im Bank’s climate-relevant financing activities:

  1. Financial instrument offerings and trends in their use to inform how public institutions can tailor financial tools and terms to specific sectoral and project requirements;

  2. Replicable financing structures that showcase how public financial institutions can work with each other and with the private sector to overcome unique investment barriers in climate-relevant investments in developing countries; and

  3. Institutional barriers that can hamper public institutions like OPIC and Ex-Im Bank from more effectively deploying financial instruments to unlock investment in climate-relevant markets.

结论

1) Tailoring traditional financial instruments to address investment risks specific to climate-relevant sectors can unlock new sources of private finance. Unique financing structures have helped address specific project requirements for climate-relevant projects. For instance, OPIC structured a direct loan to ContourGlobal Solutions Holdings to serve as a portfolio credit facility, and created a loan guarantee to SunEdison Thailand to act as a revolving construction bridge financing facility (see Section III). OPIC has also designed new political risk insurance instruments that protect against unexpected changes in climate change-related policies (see Section III and the Oddar Meanchey case study).

2) Public financial institutions can maximize their impact by playing complementary roles depending on their risk profiles and instrument offerings. For example, OPIC is often a first-mover, supporting first-of-their-kind projects and testing out new financial instruments. Ex-Im Bank, on the other hand, provides very inexpensive debt on concessional terms, but has a lower risk-tolerance relative to OPIC, and thus tends to finance more established players. OPIC clients could graduate to become Ex-Im Bank clients to benefit from the comparative advantages of each institution and help Ex-Im Bank build its pipeline of climate-relevant projects. Furthermore, OPIC and Ex-Im Bank support can be further complemented by financing from other multilateral and bilateral public financial institutions—either concurrently or at different points in time (see Section III and IV and case studies, particularly the Azure Power case study).

摘要

WRI’s “Climate Finance” series tackles a broad range of issues relevant to public contributors, intermediaries, and recipients of climate finance—that is, financial flows to developing countries to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to climate change impacts. A subset of this series, including this paper on OPIC and Ex-Im Bank, examines how different types of public climate finance providers and intermediaries–or international finance entities like the proposed Green Climate Fund–can help meet the significant investment needs of developing countries by mobilizing private sector investment. These publications acknowledge the importance of over-arching support for complementary climate change policies that create attractive market conditions domestically but focus on the use of financial instruments.

主题Finance
标签climate finance ; finance ; investment
区域United States
URLhttps://www.wri.org/publication/unlocking-private-climate-investment
来源智库World Resources Institute (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/27843
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Giulia Christianson,Shally Venugopal,Shilpa Patel. Unlocking Private Climate Investment. 2013.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Giulia Christianson]的文章
[Shally Venugopal]的文章
[Shilpa Patel]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Giulia Christianson]的文章
[Shally Venugopal]的文章
[Shilpa Patel]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Giulia Christianson]的文章
[Shally Venugopal]的文章
[Shilpa Patel]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。