| 来源类型 | Working Paper |
| 规范类型 | 论文 |
| Deferred Prosecution | |
| Richard M. Cooper | |
| 发表日期 | 2006-08-01 |
| 出版年 | 2006 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | The federal prosecution of Arthur Andersen in 2002 led to the demise of the firm, the loss of many thousands of jobs, and a significant reduction in the number of American accounting firms that can meet the needs of very large corporations.[1] Subsequently, federal prosecutors have increasingly used against corporations and other business organizations the technique of deferred prosecution as a means to avoid the kind of collateral damage that destroyed Arthur Andersen.[2] This monograph explores the nature and history of deferred prosecution and assesses its current role among the techniques for enforcing the criminal law against corporations and other business organizations. Click here to view the full text of this Briefly as an Adobe Acrobat PDF. |
| 主题 | Society and Culture |
| 标签 | business ; corporations ; Criminal Justice Reform |
| URL | https://www.aei.org/research-products/working-paper/deferred-prosecution/ |
| 来源智库 | American Enterprise Institute (United States) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/206918 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Richard M. Cooper. Deferred Prosecution. 2006. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| 20070809_BRIEFLY_Aug（342KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Richard M. Cooper]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Richard M. Cooper]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Richard M. Cooper]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
