Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
Foreign Law in Constitutional Interpretation | |
Antonin Scalia | |
发表日期 | 2009-08-20 |
出版年 | 2009 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | I will talk today about the use of foreign law in American judicial opinions. Since most of what I will have to say is unfavorable to the use of foreign law, I feel I should begin by pointing out that I am not a xenophobe. I do not mind foreign law. In fact, in my years as a law professor, I used to teach foreign law. One of my subjects was comparative law. I indeed believe that comparative law might well be made a mandatory subject in United States law schools. Just as you do not understand your own language until you have taken a foreign language (whether it be Latin, German or any other one), you do not understand your own legal system until you see how the ordering of the same matters could be done in a different way. The only way to appreciate the distinctiveness of your system–what drives it–is to examine some other system. Click here to view the full text of this working paper as an Adobe Acrobat PDF. |
主题 | Constitution |
标签 | America ; Antonin Scalia ; foreign ; law ; US Constitution |
URL | https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/foreign-law-in-constitutional-interpretation/ |
来源智库 | American Enterprise Institute (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/205413 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Antonin Scalia. Foreign Law in Constitutional Interpretation. 2009. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
20090820-Chapter2.pd(222KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Antonin Scalia]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Antonin Scalia]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Antonin Scalia]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。