Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Research Report/Study |
规范类型 | 报告 |
Short analysis of the RED 2009, the iLUC Directive 2015 and the 2016 RED proposal regarding implications for nature protection | |
Hennenberg, K.; Böttcher, H.; Fehrenbach, H.; Bischoff, M. | |
发表日期 | 2017-10 |
出版年 | 2017 |
语种 | 英语 |
概述 | The present study examined the current proposal for the amendment of the EU Renewable Energy Directive (RED). From a nature protection perspective, the RED proposal shows several shortcomings and gaps.The paper closes with a discussion... |
摘要 | Short analysis of the RED 2009, the iLUC Directive 2015 and the 2016 RED proposal regarding implications for nature protection The present study examined the current proposal for the amendment of the EU Renewable Energy Directive (RED). From a nature protection perspective, the RED proposal shows several shortcomings and gaps.The paper closes with a discussion of challenges associated with extending the RED focusing on closing identified gaps and addressing the highlighted shortcomings. The paper documents work in progress and does not represent a complete analysis. |
URL | https://www.oeko.de/en/publications/p-details/short-analysis-of-the-red-2009-the-iluc-directive-2015-and-the-2016-red-proposal-regarding-implicat/ |
来源智库 | Institute for Applied Ecology (Germany) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/136410 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Hennenberg, K.,Böttcher, H.,Fehrenbach, H.,et al. Short analysis of the RED 2009, the iLUC Directive 2015 and the 2016 RED proposal regarding implications for nature protection. 2017. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
OEKO-IFEU-2017-RED-p(423KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。