来源类型 | Research Reports
|
规范类型 | 报告
|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR1933
|
ISBN | 9780833099211
|
来源ID | RR-1933-UNC
|
| Landscape Survey to Support Flood Apex National Flood Decision Support Toolbox: Definitions and Existing Tools |
| Aaron Strong; Debra Knopman
|
发表日期 | 2017
|
出版年 | 2017
|
页码 | 144
|
语种 | 英语
|
结论 |
Decision Analysis and Support Frameworks and Indicators Need to Be Tailored to Each Individual Community- Although some general frameworks and indicator systems are portable across communities, they must be adapted on a case-by-case basis to be useful.
As the Resilience Paradigm Has Grown, So Have Decision Support Systems and Tools and the Thinking About the Decisions Needed in the First Place- Decision support tools have moved from basic physical models, including maps and tabletop demonstrations and informed by historical flood patterns and basic geophysical measurements, to sophisticated hydrodynamic simulations that can produce detailed snapshots of expected property damage and infrastructure performance under thousands of futures that explore climate and other uncertainties.
- In the United States and in many other parts of the world, the idea that government experts should design and harden infrastructure to protect citizens from flooding has shifted to a model of resilience and robustness, based not just on hard infrastructure but also on investments in natural and social capital that enable communities to mitigate impacts of flood events and recover more quickly.
- Deep uncertainty is increasingly appreciated as an important aspect of risk analysis and risk management. This is particularly true as we enter an era of changing rainfall patterns, storm intensities, and sea levels, wherein historical patterns might no longer be reliable predictors of future conditions.
|
摘要 |
- Any national effort focused on decision support tools (DSTs) should consider the goal of building a toolbox rather than crafting a single tool that can meet all community needs for decision support. A one-size-fits-all solution to the challenge of building community resilience to flood risk does not exist. DSTs need to be tailored to communities' needs and technical abilities.
- Additional tools and models need to be developed to better estimate the loss following a flooding event that capture effects beyond structural damage.
- How DSTs are disseminated to communities needs particular attention. Communities need guidance through the decisionmaking process.
- The interdependencies among environmental, social, and other systems have not as yet been considered explicitly. This appears to be an area ripe for advancement.
|
主题 | Community Resilience
; Emergency Preparedness
; Flooding
|
URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1933.html
|
来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States)
|
引用统计 |
|
资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108558
|
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 |
Aaron Strong,Debra Knopman. Landscape Survey to Support Flood Apex National Flood Decision Support Toolbox: Definitions and Existing Tools. 2017.
|
文件名:
|
x1504790457824.jpg
|
格式:
|
JPEG
|
文件名:
|
RAND_RR1933.pdf
|
格式:
|
Adobe PDF
|
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。