G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR1934
来源IDRR-1934-NIJ
Can an Informative Letter Reduce Gun Crime and Be Cost-Effective? A Study of Los Angeles
Priscillia Hunt; Layla Parast; Gabriel Weinberger
发表日期2017
出版年2017
页码48
语种英语
结论

Effects on Prevention

  • We were unable to detect a reliable citywide effect for the letter program on homicides, robberies, or aggravated assaults with a firearm.
  • While a statistical analysis would not have been able to identify the prevention of one or two crimes at a citywide level regardless of the true effects, it is also unclear whether the letter program can prevent any firearm violence.
  • One limitation of our methodology is that people could have transferred guns to individuals who committed gun crimes outside of Los Angeles, thus contaminating our control group.

Costs

  • The cost of the program was approximately $1.13 to $1.85 per letter, or $145 to $428 per day.
  • Considering the cost of the program relative to the societal benefits of preventing victimization, if the program prevents one homicide, one aggravated assault, or two robberies, then the program achieves a net benefit to society.

Statistical Approaches

  • For the short-term, time-series model, results suggest an immediate decline in firearms robberies after implementation of the letter program, but no such changes in aggravated assaults or homicides with a firearm.
  • Using the long-term, time-series model, results suggest no statistically significant effect on firearms robberies, but a statistically significant decrease of homicide with a handgun and aggravated assault with a firearm.
  • Because results are so highly sensitive to model specification, they are not robust enough to draw conclusions.
  • Similarly, a comparative case study approach was also used but did not identify a good enough statistical control group for Los Angeles to reliably analyze the effect of the letter.
摘要
  • Attorney's Offices should consider the trade-off between the relatively low cost of the letter intervention and yet relatively limited effect on city-level gun crime.
  • A better approach than analyzing aggregate, city-level data might be to conduct tests that are more sensitive to the effect of the letter intervention, such as an analysis based on gun-level data or a test for whether there are differences by subgroups based on characteristics of the gun purchase.
  • Another possible approach might be to study the data over a longer period with a long follow-up for testing the effects on crime, because it takes time for a gun to be used and to be recovered.
主题Crime and Violence Prevention ; Gun Violence ; Los Angeles
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1934.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108536
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Priscillia Hunt,Layla Parast,Gabriel Weinberger. Can an Informative Letter Reduce Gun Crime and Be Cost-Effective? A Study of Los Angeles. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1501705593834.jpg(4KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR1934.pdf(838KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Priscillia Hunt]的文章
[Layla Parast]的文章
[Gabriel Weinberger]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Priscillia Hunt]的文章
[Layla Parast]的文章
[Gabriel Weinberger]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Priscillia Hunt]的文章
[Layla Parast]的文章
[Gabriel Weinberger]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1501705593834.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_RR1934.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。