来源类型 | Research Reports
|
规范类型 | 报告
|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR1934
|
来源ID | RR-1934-NIJ
|
| Can an Informative Letter Reduce Gun Crime and Be Cost-Effective? A Study of Los Angeles |
| Priscillia Hunt; Layla Parast; Gabriel Weinberger
|
发表日期 | 2017
|
出版年 | 2017
|
页码 | 48
|
语种 | 英语
|
结论 |
Effects on Prevention- We were unable to detect a reliable citywide effect for the letter program on homicides, robberies, or aggravated assaults with a firearm.
- While a statistical analysis would not have been able to identify the prevention of one or two crimes at a citywide level regardless of the true effects, it is also unclear whether the letter program can prevent any firearm violence.
- One limitation of our methodology is that people could have transferred guns to individuals who committed gun crimes outside of Los Angeles, thus contaminating our control group.
Costs- The cost of the program was approximately $1.13 to $1.85 per letter, or $145 to $428 per day.
- Considering the cost of the program relative to the societal benefits of preventing victimization, if the program prevents one homicide, one aggravated assault, or two robberies, then the program achieves a net benefit to society.
Statistical Approaches- For the short-term, time-series model, results suggest an immediate decline in firearms robberies after implementation of the letter program, but no such changes in aggravated assaults or homicides with a firearm.
- Using the long-term, time-series model, results suggest no statistically significant effect on firearms robberies, but a statistically significant decrease of homicide with a handgun and aggravated assault with a firearm.
- Because results are so highly sensitive to model specification, they are not robust enough to draw conclusions.
- Similarly, a comparative case study approach was also used but did not identify a good enough statistical control group for Los Angeles to reliably analyze the effect of the letter.
|
摘要 |
- Attorney's Offices should consider the trade-off between the relatively low cost of the letter intervention and yet relatively limited effect on city-level gun crime.
- A better approach than analyzing aggregate, city-level data might be to conduct tests that are more sensitive to the effect of the letter intervention, such as an analysis based on gun-level data or a test for whether there are differences by subgroups based on characteristics of the gun purchase.
- Another possible approach might be to study the data over a longer period with a long follow-up for testing the effects on crime, because it takes time for a gun to be used and to be recovered.
|
主题 | Crime and Violence Prevention
; Gun Violence
; Los Angeles
|
URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1934.html
|
来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States)
|
引用统计 |
|
资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108536
|
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 |
Priscillia Hunt,Layla Parast,Gabriel Weinberger. Can an Informative Letter Reduce Gun Crime and Be Cost-Effective? A Study of Los Angeles. 2017.
|
文件名:
|
x1501705593834.jpg
|
格式:
|
JPEG
|
文件名:
|
RAND_RR1934.pdf
|
格式:
|
Adobe PDF
|
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。