来源类型 | Research Reports
|
规范类型 | 报告
|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR1566.1
|
来源ID | RR-1566/1-EDA
|
| Medical Support to Light Footprint Operations: Why smaller operations require a different approach to medical support |
| Susanne Sondergaard; Marta Kepe; James Sladden; Adam C. Resnick; Darryl Metcalf; Ann C. Sims-Columbia; Anthony Marinos
|
发表日期 | 2015
|
出版者 | RAND Corporation
|
出版年 | 2015
|
页码 | 11
|
语种 | 英语
|
结论 |
No definition of light footprint operations has been proposed- Given that there is no definition of a light footprint operation in EU doctrine despite a number of EU missions having its characteristics, the study proposed a new definition that has been developed to be consistent with existing related EU policies and doctrines.
Current medical support practices to operations are varied- Case studies showed that while there are standard operating procedures, agreement and doctrinal requirements of medical capabilities in place, each national medical treatment facility or element works to its own national clinical standard.
European medical support capabilities differ depending on country priorities- Findings from the survey on the medical capabilities of the European Defence Agency's participating member states showed that the more complex or advanced the medical capabilities were the more likely the gaps at European level.
European countries are interested in standardisation and harmonisation among their militaries and with civilian sector- While different cultures and expectations exist within Europe with regards to medical support, overall the development of common standards was seen positively.
New technologies can improve resilience of soldiers and enhance medical support for LFOs- While technology may assist in improving medical support in LFOs, further development and monitoring is required to ensure that they are fit-for-purpose and that possible concerns are answered.
Medical support options have been developed and their feasibility assessed- Medical support feasibility assessment was carried out for four different LFO scenarios and options for the lowest possible capacity that can be generated for LFOS were developed.
|
摘要 |
- Introduce changes to current EU doctrine on medical support.
- Improve harmonisation and standardisation for greater interoperability between forces medical support.
- Reconsider the concept of roles and options for potential modularisation
- Consider opportunities for multinational cooperation in the development and deployment of new technologies.
- Seek to develop and nurture engagement and cross learning between the military and civilian medical community.
|
主题 | Combat Medicine
; European Union
; Military Mobilization
; Military Tactics
|
URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1566z1.html
|
来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States)
|
引用统计 |
|
资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/107904
|
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 |
Susanne Sondergaard,Marta Kepe,James Sladden,et al. Medical Support to Light Footprint Operations: Why smaller operations require a different approach to medical support. 2015.
|
文件名:
|
1497012391511.jpg
|
格式:
|
JPEG
|
文件名:
|
RAND_RR1566z1.pdf
|
格式:
|
Adobe PDF
|
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。