G2TT
来源类型Publication
Funding Natura 2000
Marianne Kettunen; David Baldock; Sonja Gantioler; Odette Carter; Peter Torkler (WWF Germany); A Arroyo; A Baumueller; E. Gerritsen; Matt Rayment; E. Daly; M. Pieterse
发表日期2011-03-31
出版年2011
语种英语
概述The study assesses the successes and shortcomings of the existing EU framework for funding Natura 2000 and identifies possibilities for improving these financing arrangements in the future.
摘要

Funding Natura 2000

The study by IEEP, WWF and GHK aims to support an improved integration of Natura 2000 into the next EU budget. This study, carried out for the European Commission, assesses the successes and shortcomings of the existing EU framework for funding Natura 2000. It also identifies possibilities for improving these financing arrangements in the future.

Despite the increased effort and some good examples on financing Natura 2000 from the Community funds, the funding allocated to Natura 2000 from the EU budget appears inadequate. The study estimates that the financial allocations for Natura 2000 from the EU budget are between 550 – 1150 million EUR / year. This range should be considered a rough approximation only as the lack of transparency and detail in the EU funds’ budgetary allocations makes it difficult to estimate the overall EU contribution. The estimated figures represent only 9-19 per cent of the estimated financing needs of 5.8 billion EUR / year. 

The relatively small contribution of the EU budget to Natura 2000 can be explained by a number of factors. Even though a rather wide range of Natura 2000 measures are eligible for financing under the different EU funds, some gaps still remain (eg ongoing management and monitoring of Natura 2000 sites). A range of constraints, such as limited integration of Natura 2000 into the national funding priorities and lack of stakeholders’ capacity, also hinder the uptake of opportunities provided by the EU co-financing framework.

The study concludes that improving the existing integrated approach to co-financing Natura 2000 seems to provide the most politically feasible, effective and risk-averse way forward. For example, improving the availability and targeting of financial allocations, as well as their transparency, are considered as key improvements for the future. In addition, it is foreseen that support for capacity building and exploration of innovative resources (eg innovative ways to use the existing funds and the development of new mechanisms for financing) could help to increase the overall funding available.

Downloads

关键词Natura 2000 financial instruments biodiversity EU budget
URLhttps://ieep.eu/publications/financing-natura-2000
来源智库Institute for European Environmental Policy (United Kingdom)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/102352
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Marianne Kettunen,David Baldock,Sonja Gantioler,et al. Funding Natura 2000. 2011.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
Assessment_of_Natura(2723KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Marianne Kettunen]的文章
[David Baldock]的文章
[Sonja Gantioler]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Marianne Kettunen]的文章
[David Baldock]的文章
[Sonja Gantioler]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Marianne Kettunen]的文章
[David Baldock]的文章
[Sonja Gantioler]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: Assessment_of_Natura_2000_Co-financing.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。